Skip to main content

Sen. Portman demands answers from Department of Health and Human Services on failure of safeguards against human trafficking

Lead Summary
By
-

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) and Co-Chair of the Senate Caucus to End Human Trafficking, demanded answers from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) about the adequacy of safeguards in the Office of Refugee Resettlement’s (ORR) placement of unaccompanied minors with qualified sponsors.

As recently reported by the Columbus Dispatch, a federal grand jury indicted four defendants for allegedly trafficking Guatemalan nationals and placing them in forced labor near Marion, Ohio. It was revealed in that indictment that ORR released several of these minor victims into the hands of their traffickers, based on the defendants’ false promises to care for the children’s well-being, send them to school, and protect them from abuse.

In a letter to HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Portman writes that, “on five occasions, the traffickers’ minor victims were detained and transferred to the custody of the ORR.

"ORR is responsible for ensuring that unaccompanied minors who are not legally in the United States, like the victims in this case, are released to the custody of a qualified adult sponsor capable of ‘provid[ing] for the physical and mental well-being of children.’ On each occasion, one of the defendants’ co-conspirators submitted a falsified Family Reunification Application to ORR, claiming that he was either a relative or family friend of the victim and that the victim would be able to attend school and would be protected from abuse in his custody.”

Portman raises concerns that on each of these five occasions, according to the indictment, ORR released the victims into the hands of these traffickers.


 

[[In-content Ad]]

The letter is below.

July 13, 2015

The Hon. Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Secretary
Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201


Dear Secretary Burwell:

On July 1, 2015, a federal grand jury indicted four defendants for allegedly trafficking Guatemalan nationals and placing them in abusive, forced labor near Marion, Ohio. Several of these victims were minors, some as young as fourteen years old. The indictment indicates that the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) released several of these victims into the hands of traffickers, under false pretenses. I write to raise questions regarding the adequacy of ORR’s safeguards against this tragic abuse.

According to the indictment, the defendants and unnamed conspirators have allegedly lured Guatemalan nationals to the United States to work in forced labor for several years. In early 2014, these traffickers focused their attention on younger victims, on the theory that they would be easier to control and would work harder than older victims. The indictment further charges that these traffickers recruited victims to the United States with cold efficiency. They often promised the victims’ families that their children would be able to attend school in the United States. Once in the country, however, the victims would be required to work punishing twelve-hour shifts, six or seven days a week, on industrial chicken farms. They were housed in squalid trailers and subjected to psychological abuse. The traffickers would tell the victims that, unless they surrendered their paychecks, the traffickers would injure or kill the victims’ family members.

The indictment indicates that, on five occasions, the traffickers’ minor victims were detained and transferred to the custody of the ORR. ORR is responsible for ensuring that unaccompanied minors who are not legally in the United States, like the victims in this case, are released to the custody of a qualified adult sponsor capable of “provid[ing] for the physical and mental well-being of children.” On each occasion, one of the defendants’ associates submitted a falsified Family Reunification Application to ORR, claiming that he was either a relative or family friend of the victim and that the victim would be able to attend school and would be protected from abuse in his custody. On each of these five occasions, according to the indictment, ORR released the victims into the hands of these traffickers.

If true, it appears that the ORR child placement process has gravely failed. A single case of trafficking is harmful enough. But if ORR does not have adequate safeguards in place, there is cause for concern that this has happened in other cases and could happen again. To assist the Subcommittee in understanding how this could have happened and what is being done to prevent this from happening again, please provide the following information by July 28, 2015:

1. A copy of the Family Reunification Applications submitted for the release of the victims identified in the Superseding Indictment, United States v. Castillo-Serrano, Case No. 3:15-00024, Dkt. No. 28 (N.D. Ohio July 1, 2015), as well as any corresponding documents submitted in support of the applications and any follow-up documents created by ORR.

2. What did ORR do to verify the information provided by the qualified adult sponsors for Victims 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 identified in United States v. Castillo-Serrano? What did ORR do to ensure the safety and well-being of those victims?

3. What type of contact does ORR have with prospective sponsors prior to transferring custody of an unaccompanied alien child to the individual?

4. On July 7, 2015, Mark Greenberg, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Administration for Children and Families testified to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that ORR generally relies on documentation submitted by the potential sponsor and “outside confirmation of a potential sponsor’s identity.” Describe these documents and what constitutes “outside confirmation of a potential sponsor’s identity.” What does ORR do if these sources of information are unavailable?

5. Does ORR allow an individual to act as a sponsor if that individual has a criminal history? If so, please describe the level of criminal history that is disqualifying.

6. The Family Reunification Application requires a prospective sponsor to state whether he or any person in his household has ever been investigated for the physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, or abandonment of a minor. Describe how ORR verifies this information, including which databases on which ORR runs checks.

7. Assistant Secretary Greenberg stated that, for the great majority of children who are released to sponsors, HHS does not provide ongoing post-release services. What is the justification for that policy?

Add new comment

This is not for publication.
This is not for publication.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it. Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.