Skip to main content

Rep. Brad Wenstrup announces subpoena for top Fauci adviser after whistleblower allegations confirmed

Washington, D.C. – Today, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) announced a subpoena to compel Dr. David Morens — a top adviser to Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — to hand over documents from his personal email account related to COVID-19. Dr. Morens has also agreed to testify in front of the Select Subcommittee at a public hearing later this year.
Recent whistleblower allegations revealed new, additional evidence that Dr. Morens intentionally used his personal email to hide conversations about the origins of COVID-19 and subvert federal transparency laws. Last week, Dr. Morens’s self-proclaimed “best friend” — EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak — released four document tranches that confirmed the whistleblower’s allegations. Notably, Dr. Daszak is at the center of controversy related to his use of U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In the emails released by EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Morens recklessly provided Dr. Daszak with access to non-public information and offered insight into internal conversations at NIAID. In one email, Dr. Morens appears to have disclosed Dr. Fauci's efforts and provided Dr. Daszak with information about internal deliberations related to EcoHealth Alliance’s grant suspension. Dr. Morens wrote in an email to Dr. Daszak, “Tony is now fully aware I think and is I am told involved in some sort of damage control.” In another email, Dr. Daszak agrees to contact Dr. Morens via his personal Gmail account instead of his government email account to communicate about information related to COVID-19 and NIAID grants stating, “David – We’ll communicate with you via gmail from now on” and then concerningly adds “we have 15,000 samples in freezers in Wuhan.”
The Select Subcommittee is aware of additional correspondence related to COVID-19 in Dr. Morens’s personal email account that has not yet been released. Today’s subpoena compels the production of this correspondence.
“Dr. David Morens purposefully evaded FOIA laws to give his ‘best-friend’ EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak non-public, internal information that had the potential to undermine the operations of the United States government. This is not only highly concerning, but it is also likely illegal. Dr. Morens must be held accountable for any abuse of power and his blatant disregard for the law. The subpoena for Dr. Morens’s personal email communication will ensure that the truth about this federal records violation is brought to light. Unfortunately, this pattern of abusing federal power appears to stretch beyond Dr. Morens, Dr. Daszak, and NIH. This subpoena is an important effort to ensure that federal health officials never again feel empowered to duck accountability to the American people and willfully undermine our elected government,” said Chairman Wenstrup.


In June 2023, the Select Subcommittee released a batch of emails in which Dr. Morens claims to hide COVID-19 information. Dr. Morens wrote, “I always try to communicate over gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly” and “I will delete anything I don’t want to see in the New York Times.”

After receiving a letter from the Select Subcommittee detailing Dr. Morens’s potential federal records violation, the NIH removed Dr. Morens from his position and placed him on administrative leave.

In October 2023, Chairman Wenstrup announced a subpoena for NIH records related to Dr. Morens’s potential federal records violation. NIH conducted an internal investigation into Dr. Morens’s suspicious actions but refused to share relevant findings with the American people or Congress.

In November 2023, EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak appeared for a transcribed interview — during which he called Dr. Morens a “mentor.”

In December 2023, Dr. Morens was scheduled to appear for a transcribed interview. The Department of Health and Human Services derailed the transcribed interview after they prohibited Dr. Morens from answering any questions about the origins of COVID-19.

In January 2024, Dr. Morens appeared for a transcribed interview — after which Chairman Wenstrup vowed to receive access to Dr. Morens’s personal email account. Key takeaways from the transcribed interview can be found here.

In April 2024, the Select Subcommittee revealed new information from a whistleblower that appeared to provide further evidence of Dr. Morens intentionally subverting federal transparency laws to shield discussions related to the origins of COVID-19.

Wenstrup opens hearing on examining academic 
malpractice with editor of scientific journal

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) opened today’s hearing titled “Academic Malpractice: Examining the Relationship Between Scientific Journals, the Government, and Peer Review” with a reminder that political influence and government intervention has no place in the peer review process at top scientific journals. 

Although the editors of Nature, Science, and The Lancet were all invited to participate in today’s hearing, Chairman Wenstrup noted that only the editor of Science had the courage to appear before the Select Subcommittee. Chairman Wenstrup explained how these prestigious, scientific journals wrongly published articles — such as the infamous “Proximal Origin” paper and “Lancet Letter” — to quash robust debate and discussion about the origins of COVID-19. 

Considering top scientific journals set the tone for what is believed and discussed in the scientific community, these journals have an obligation to publish accurate information that has completed a thorough peer review process. Chairman Wenstrup concluded his remarks by emphasizing the importance of understanding the scientific review processes at top journals to ensure best practices should a future health crisis arise.

Below are Select Subcommittee Chairman Wenstrup’s remarks:

Today the Select Subcommittee is holding a hearing to examine the relationship between scientific journals and the government.

This is not a hearing to see how the government can be more involved in the journal editorial process, but to make sure that the government does not involve itself or influence this process.

Academic, scientific, and medical journals are an incredibly important tool to spread research to the masses.

There is no denying the awesome power these periodicals, as well as their editors, hold over the medical and scientific communities, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, the world.

I utilized journals in my practice on almost a daily basis, they are an important component to the practice of science.

And because of that there can be no place for politics or inappropriate government influence.

Journals, and subsequently their editors, are telling the world about research that has been conducted, yet it is important to note they are not necessarily the arbiters of truth.

They provide a forum where scientific claims are made, defended, and debated by peer review.

However, we saw a breakdown of that during the pandemic.

Rather than journals being a wealth of information and opinions about the novel virus, they helped establish a party line that literally put a chilling effect on scientific research regarding the origins of COVID-19 and scientific communications.

As I have stated time and time again, this Subcommittee was established so we can collectively take a look back on the pandemic and see what we can do better for the next time.

We invited the editors-in-chief of The Lancet, Nature, and Science.

Only the editor of Science had the courage to come and help us be better.

And we are very thankful to Dr. Thorp for being here today and I appreciate the frank and professional conversation we had before today.

The purpose of this hearing is to demystify the publication process.

The editors hold an extraordinary amount of power within the journals and publication process – a process that is a black box to most of the public. 

They act as an umpire to judge the scientific research that is being published.

Like an umpire, it is vital they know about the sport and rules of play, but they themselves should never be in the competition.

But that is what appeared to have happened during COVID-19.

And it is important to separate opinion vs. scientifically proven fact. And to highlight that varying hypotheses may exist.

The publications of papers like Proximal Origin, which this Subcommittee has exposed as lacking in scientific integrity as well as being “prompted” by Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins, and the Lancet Letter – where the Lancet did not even bother to check for conflicts of interest – set a precedent, from two of the most prestigious journals in the world, that the natural origin of COVID-19 was the only theory plausible. Period. The end.

But this is not the case.

And anyone else who even had the inkling of another, plausible, scientific thought, was immediately labeled a conspiracy theorist.

A conspiracy theorist? How is that acceptable in the scientific community? When the entire crux of the field is about open debate?

I hope – that as you say Dr. Thorp – if a paper with an altering opinion was proposed, it would have been given a fair shot.

There is value in giving science a fair hearing. It should be the most pure and honest form of debate.

We are holding this hearing to help shed light on the journal process, so everyone can have a greater understanding of how business is conducted.

I again express my disappointment that Dr. Skipper from Nature and Dr. Horton from the Lancet declined to participate today.

And again, reiterate our appreciation that Dr. Thorp stood up and showed integrity to testify before this Select Subcommittee today.

* * *

Publisher's note: A free press is critical to having well-informed voters and citizens. While some news organizations opt for paid websites or costly paywalls, The Highland County Press has maintained a free newspaper and website for the last 25 years for our community. If you would like to contribute to this service, it would be greatly appreciated. Donations may be made to: The Highland County Press, P.O. Box 849, Hillsboro, Ohio 45133. Please include "for website" on the memo line.

Add new comment

This is not for publication.
This is not for publication.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it. Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.