Skip to main content

Clyburn: Greenfield voters should keep city manager form of government

By Rory Ryan
The Highland County Press

On May 8, 2007, Greenfield voters approved organizing the village under a new city manager form of government as provided in Ohio Revised Code 705.41-705.86.

The duties of the city manager shall consist of those prescribed in Ohio R.C. 705.59 and also the following additional duties prescribed below and any other duties as required by future ordinance or resolution. The duties of the city manager include:

• Serve as safety-service director and community development coordinator.

• Make recommendations concerning affairs of the village such as annexation, long-range and capital improvement projects.

• Make reports concerning operations of village departments, offices and other agencies that may provide direct services to the City that are under the City Manager’s direction and supervision.

• Prepare and submit annual reports on finances and administrative activities to the public, village employees and Council.

• Manage day-to-day operations.

• Appoint or remove any appointed officers and/or village employees in the classified service consistent with state laws and local ordinances.

• Make recommendations concerning the appointment and/or removal of unclassified officers and/or village employees to the City Council.

• Delegate duties and responsibilities to all departments, village officers and employees who are under his authority.

• Promote and develop the industrial park.

• Write and submit grants to promote the village, redevelop and develop the village infrastructure and public facilities.

• Administer village planning, zoning and economic development plans.

• Serve as staff liaison and support as needed for the Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, Recreation Commission, Civil Service Commission and Downtown Design Review Board.

Now, after almost 17 years of a city manager form of government, a group of citizens are working to have Greenfield return to a mayoral form of government.

During an April 9 special meeting of council, representatives of the “Greenfield Reform Group" said they had collected “almost 300 signatures” on their petitions to “adjust the village form of government.

“We are meeting with our lawyer to actually have them placed on a special ballot soon,” Amie Ernst said. “We’ll be getting that finalized with the Board of Elections through all the legal processes that our attorney advises us to, to be submitted soon for a special election.” 

Some of the community concerns expressed during the April 9 meeting were regarding the current administration, council and/or employees of the village; grants; village projects; communication between the village government and residents; water and sewer rates; treatment of businesses, citizens and/or village staff; and need for increased checks and balances. 

After hearing from citizens on April 9, council entered an executive session to discuss Wilkin’s employment. There was a 2-1 vote, with one abstention, to remove the city manager, which failed.

On Monday, April 15, Greenfield Council President Phil Clyburn met with The Highland County Press and encouraged voters to maintain support for the city manager form of government.

Clyburn said as he understands it, if the village returns to a mayoral form of government, voters will have to elect a new mayor, city auditor and law director. Prior to that vote in November, Clyburn said Greenfield would first have a special election to determine its form of government.

Contrary to some rumors, Clyburn also noted that a new mayor cannot remove current members of council, who are selected by the voters. 

Clyburn also produced a copy of an anonymous complaint to the Ohio Auditor of State Special Investigations Unit dated Dec. 6, 2023. After stating five allegations of "misuse of funds by various village officials," the state auditor's office concluded, "Caller stated his complaints are verifiable through the village Facebook page; the caller does not have any specific documents to provide."

When asked about the benefits of a city manager form over a mayor form of government, Clyburn said, "With a city manager, you have someone with knowledge of private-sector business and government and its many facets. The city manager can be selected from anywhere, based on his or her qualifications.

"With a mayor form, voters are limited to the adult residents of Greenfield; the same goes for city auditor and law director."

Clyburn also credited current Greenfield City Manager Todd Wilkin for securing millions of dollars in grant funds for village infrastructure and local business support. Clyburn also gave Wilkin credit for obtaining grant dollars to improve the railroad line that supports at least three local manufacturers. In addition, (not including retirement) the village employment level has maintained a turnover rate of approximately 5 percent during Wilkin's tenure, which is below the national average of 6.1 percent for government employees nationwide.

As reported in 2020, Greenfield was awarded a grant totaling more than $3.4 million for improvements on its 29-mile rail spur. The award came with the help of partnerships with the Highland County Board of Commissioners, the Appalachian Partnership for Economic Growth), ODRC (Ohio Rail Development Commission, the Ohio Department of Transportation, the Governor’s Office of Appalachia and the Federal Appalachian Regional Commission. Through the partnerships, the match money of more than $1.7 million was raised for the 50/50 grant. That money was matched through the federal Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program.

"Adient, Huhtamaki and Candle-lite must have that railroad," Clyburn said. "Todd worked very hard to get those dollars for Greenfield. The village also has added 111 jobs since Todd took office."

In addition, Clyburn provided a list of more than 20 Greenfield businesses that have received money through Greenfield's revolving loan fund since Wilkin has been in office.

Since Wilkin was hired six years ago, the village:

• Was awarded a $3,881,035.00 CRISI Grant for the railroad that supports 1,200 to 1,800 jobs for Highland County – $125,000 is what the village is paying for this work. 

• The village worked with the council to provide employee raises every year and increase starting salaries for all employees, while working to ensure insurance monthly premiums were not increased in six years. 

• The village received more than $14 million in funding through grants and a few low-interest loans to rebuild failing infrastructure throughout the town. Of the $14 million, the village received $10,930,848.50 in grants it does not pay back, which is 76 percent of the total dollars coming into the village.

• The village started Industrial Round Table meetings in Greenfield with Adient, Corvac, Candle-lite, Greenfield Precision Plastics, Greenfield Products, Greenfield Research, Huhtamaki, Weastec, Wooden It Be Nice and other partners during Wilkin's tenure. These meetings evolved into the Highland County Think Tank, which Wilkin assembled with all the Highland County schools, Economic Development Office, Chamber of Commerce, Southern State Community College, Lt. Governor Jon Husted’s office, Southern Ohio ESC and other key partners, and the Highland County Think Tank then evolved into the Workforce Leadership Council, which created ACCESS. 

• When Wilkin started in April 2018, the General Fund was projected to be a $0.00 carryover into 2019. After recommendations to the 2018 budget, the village finished the year with a carryover of $199,000. After six years with Wilkin in office, the village started this year with an $877,000 carryover.  

• The village assisted Adient in expanding its tank storage facility, which represented a $6 million investment in the facility and secured jobs in Greenfield.  

• In 2018, the village: adopted its Economic Development Plan; the South Central Ohio Industrial Park was site authenticated by the state of Ohio; started working with RITA (Regional Income Tax Agency), grants awarded totaled $1.4 million; started enforcement of blighted properties; started the Industrial Round Table Meetings with all local industry.

• In 2019, the village received grants of almost $4 million. The village remodeled City Hall offices to combine the water and administration offices and was awarded almost $3.9 million in railroad grants and retained 1,800 jobs associated with the rail line.

• In 2020, $100,000 for a bike trail to connect Mitchell Park and Felson Park was announced, as was pavilion money for Felson Park. The village increased the General Fund carryover from $289,000 to $442,000 during the pandemic when other communities saw a loss.

• In 2021, the village started its Façade Improvement Program with $852,000 of investment. Weastec reopened in Greenfield. Greenfield Precision Plastics opened. The general fund carryover grew from $442,000 to $676,000. 

• In 2022, the Pipes of Christmas returned; the village started First Friday events, Movie Nights, Cookie Walk and Hocus Pocus. There were 14 ribbon cuttings for new businesses in the downtown area. The general fund grew from $676,000 to $790,000. More blighted homes and buildings were disposed of throughout town and new Johnny Paycheck signs were installed.

• In 2023, the general fund increased from $790,000 to $877,000. Fiber was installed throughout town. Water bills moved from postcard billing to mailed letters. The former Elliott Hotel was demolished.

While Clyburn admitted that he originally opposed Greenfield adopting a city manager form of government, he now supports it.

"If the village has an incompetent city manager, council can remove him," Clyburn said. "If we elect a less than qualified mayor, we're stuck for four years. I support staying with our city manager form of government."

Greenfield Village Council meets Monday, April 15 at 4:45 p.m. in council chambers at the village office.

Comment

Todd Ernst (not verified)

16 April 2024

Clearly Todd Wilkin has a friend in Rory.
But does all of that money really add up?
Every time someone mentions the shabby way the administration has treated the Greenfield public and its own employees, we hear about the grants.
How much grant money makes it worth being demeaned, disenfranchised, and debased?
There is more to being boss than being bossy.
•••••• Publisher's note: As you are a minister of a Christian church or congregation, I will allow this comment. I will also disagree with it. As to the village's grant funds, at today's council meeting, someone suggested that if Greenfield rejected all state and federal grants, the dollars would "revert back." Revert back to whom, pray tell? Certainly not to the taxpayers, but to other villages, cities, counties, etc. As to your opinion of my "friendship" with Mr. Wilkin, well, he and and I both have a history on that one. Stop by my office any time.

Robert Staggs (not verified)

16 April 2024

In reply to by Todd Ernst (not verified)

I was the person who made the comment about the Federal/State Grant money, Unused money reverts back to the U.S. Treasury, If not used, So seems like you are not fully informed about Grant Money not used. The U.S. Treasury is funded by several different items, Payroll Taxes, Income Tax, Excise Taxes, Corporate taxes and a few other items, Not all grants offered are fully used, on top of that there are issues, Fraud, Embezzelment and other misuse of funds. You may find out more on this link, I feel this should be shown even though it's your site and so far limit some comments as you have stated up above. All anyone needs to do is simply look at one part of the site It is a U.S. Government site. https://www.gao.gov/blog/2016/04/20/unused-federal-grant-dollars-infogr…. You claim we have the right to a Free press so honor your own statement and don't just publish your own thoughts. We have the right to Redress our Government and I truly hope you air your grievances also, The same rights we are afforded allow you the same right to publish. What you have done is defend Mr. Wilkin and I also gave him some praise tonight but I also gave him feedback. What you haven't done this is really address what the Citizens other concerns are. Honestly Sit with Chris Borrenson or Amie Ernst and get our side of the story and What concerns we have. It would be Fair and Show that you are maintaining a Free Press, That is all we ask. Get Both sides of the story, It is not Just about Todd Wilkin and that is What you seem to think. What about our Mr. Clyburn speaking to the Citizens like he does, Do you think that is Right, How would you feel if You were spoken to like that by a Village Employee and treated like you weren't Important. I wouldn't be shocked if you didn't post this, All I'm asking is for you to be Fair to both sides and be Impartial as the owner of the HCP. I understand you may have your own personal views and I welcome them as much as I would expect you to welcome mine. Hope you have a great week.
•••Publisher's note: Your comments are fine by me. But it's still my experience that far more grant dollars are spent than returned. I've been paying taxes for more than half a century. I've yet to see a penny of federal or state grant dollars returned. I watched your presentation to council. You were fair. Thanks, and have a great week. – RR

Robert Staggs (not verified)

17 April 2024

In reply to by Robert Staggs (not verified)

There is way more going on than meets the Eye, I heard so many concerns and It got heated including myself, But after seeing everything that went on, I do see some blamed on Mr. Wilkin, But realized most of the fault is not on Mr. Wilking But Mr. Clyburn. Truth be told, He should never speak to the Citizens they way he did at the meeting, That was uncalled for and I won't stand back and be talked to that way nor allow the shenanigans they pulled that night. I have Truthfully realized the real problem is Mr. Clyburn bullying everyone, I'm wondering if he has done the Same thing with Todd Wilkin and possibly that has created the environment we now have, I'm going to speak again at the Next Council but maybe less frenzied than I did, The main Goal is to get our initiative on the Ballot and allow all Voters a chance to make their concerns heard. I want it to be fair and both sides to be fair and even if it our initiative fails, Our City Council needs to realize we need change, For 4 of the 5 to not even know Water reconnect fees for nearby Cities and for them to more than Double the fee, While we have a low income area is not fair nor right, Also Cutting folks off on a Friday and not give them a chance to pay and get restored is not something that a Citizen should worry about. There have been times they have demanded that Payments needed to be in the office and processed even if the 10th or Cutoff date is on the weekend, They have even closed early on a Friday, How can we pay our bill when their office is closed and pay on invoice cloud if they won't process it because they are closed. Simply if the Due date and cutoff is on the weekend, They should extend the time till the following Business day. Two good things came from that meeting, One is The lady that had the problems seems like they are going to help her and that is Thanks to the outstanding members of the Reform committee that came together and stood up for her, The Second is the now realize the Water Reconnect Fee might be getting reversed. I want to Thank You again for Printing my previous response, I would like to have a chance to meet with you and discuss some things. Maybe for us both to ask some questions and get some answers for both of us. You have my Number and/or email if you can find time. Thanks Again.

Mario Angellio (not verified)

17 April 2024

Todd Wilkin has a friend in Rory and Phil Clyburn is a benefactor friend of Todd Wilkin.

Government grants come from TAX collections and budget allocations. Not free... we (working people) pay for them.

Add new comment

This is not for publication.
This is not for publication.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it. Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.