YouTube
|
Twitter/HCPSports
|
YouTube/HCPSports
|
Twitter
|
Facebook
|
Home
To Advertise Call (937) 840-9490
In The News
Headlines
Social
Education
Sports
Hillsboro
Greenfield
Lynchburg
Fairfield
Whiteoak
Southern State
Opinions
Dr. Andy Bowman
Jeanette Sekan
Rory Ryan
Steve Roush
Jim Thompson
Christine Tailer
Jim Surber
Letters to Editor
R.D. Hottle
Obituaries
Classifieds
Place an ad online
Extras
REM
Community Calendar
Sports Calendar
Real Estate & Auctions
Star Cinemas
Display Ads
Photo Galleries
Videos
Link Directory
Life
About Us
Delays & Closings
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
SHARE ONLINE
Please, make sure that you have entered valid email addresses!
Link
Share with
recipients` e-mail
From
your e-mail
Subject
optional
Comments
optional
Generate New Image
Get Audio Code
Type the code from the image
Please, reenter the code in the captcha!
The link was successfully Sent!
Ooops!:( An error has occurred!
Comments (16)
Time to address nation's infrastructure
Rep. Bill Johnson
By U.S. Rep. Bill Johnson
R-Ohio
With a historic election behind us, it’s time to put aside the partisan rhetoric and move forward on rebuilding America. Among the first issues Congress and President-elect Trump should address is our aging national infrastructure. Quick action is needed to rebuild and expand roads, bridges, pipelines and other systems that will help secure a prosperous American future.
Many critical components of our infrastructure system that keep our economy running and competitive require investments to bring them up to 21st century standards.
Most of us in eastern and southeastern Ohio drive to work on a daily basis. I spend countless hours driving up and down the Ohio River myself. Just last year, Congress passed a highway bill with widespread bipartisan support that authorized more than $300 billion in infrastructure spending over five years to maintain our highways.
This bipartisan bill ended the cycle of short-term reauthorizations, and finally provided local governments with some funding assurance. However, I still have serious concerns about long-term funding provisions for these important upgrades. But I remain committed to finding creative solutions that support a world class transportation system that moves our economy forward.
One major obstacle that must be addressed is the burdensome regulatory process for approval of these vitally important projects. Government red tape costs billions of dollars, and can delay needed upgrades for years. These dollars would be better spent on American-made concrete, steel, and equipment needed to enhance our infrastructure — and the good-paying jobs these projects bring.
Like the worn-out roads and bridges that carry drivers and commerce across America, our energy infrastructure requires expansion and improvement. Ohio has played a major role in the shale gas and oil revolution that has moved America toward greater energy security. Many counties I represent are experiencing an “energy renaissance” that is positively impacting every sector of their economy.
An expansion of energy transmission systems is more important today than ever before. Such an ambitious endeavor could be as transformational as President Eisenhower’s interstate system that helped generate enormous economic growth in the decades following World War II.
We can stoke the fires of American exceptionalism around a national vision of energy independence and security. But right now, we are at a crossroads. During bitterly cold winters, a lack of pipelines has kept much needed natural gas from reaching the markets, and President Obama’s war on coal kept coal in the ground – which led to electricity price spikes that hurt families and businesses alike. The federal government is standing in the way of various pipeline applications, and broader energy development. Risks of energy scarcity like this simply cannot be tolerated by the world’s greatest economy.
While we are building up our infrastructure, we can’t forget about the communities where these resources are coming from. I’ve been pushing for legislation that would return 20 percent of revenues from drill sites on federally-owned land (such as the Wayne National Forest) to the counties whose governments provide services there. My legislation would require that this revenue be used to support infrastructure and education initiatives within that specific county. It makes perfect sense — the areas that are providing the resource should share in the benefits.
It’s time for both political parties to come together and pass legislation to reform outdated energy permitting and regulatory processes, and modernize agencies that too often stand in the way of investment. It is time to build toward an American future that takes advantage of our own natural resources and breaks down these barriers to progress.
It’s time to rebuild America’s — and Ohio’s — transportation and energy infrastructure with American workers.
1
2
16
Comments
Newest ▼
Oldest ▲
JS, Thanks. You said a mouthful! Literally!. It is complicated to the extreme! I appreciate your taking the time to answer!
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
William T. Walker
12/31/2016 4:34:00 PM
JS, as I suspected, through our gasoline tax, we subsidize the delivery of all goods and services to everyone. I am in favor of every tax of every kind paying for a particular service. Hence, with the GPS system, the truck rate per mile should be 10,000 times the rate for a car, according to your numbers. I see nothing wrong with that. Everyone thinks they are getting something for nothing with taxes--let's get all taxes to the point the beneficiary pays exactly for what they use. I would do the same thing with welfare. If welfare is distributed by the federal government, I would tax every city for the cost of the benefits that are received by the residents of that city. And on and on and on.... Nothing is free.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
Jim Thompson
12/31/2016 11:22:00 AM
WW; Yes, but like all things government, it is complicated. The Ohio fuel tax has been 28 cents per gallon (not a percentage of the cost of a gallon) since 2005; after three successive annual increases of two cents per gallon in 2003, 2004 and 2005. Now for the distribution formula: first, four funds receive the following: Waterway safety fund-0.875 percent, Motor Fuel Tax Administration Fund-0.275 percent, Wildlife Boater and Angler Fund-0.125 percent and the Grade Crossing Fund (railroads) $100,000 per month or $1.2 million per year. The Ohio Turnpike receives 5 cents per gallon on all fuel sold at the 16 stations operated by the Turnpike, the Local Transportation Improvement Fund (Ohio Public Works Commission) receives 6.7 percent. After these are funded, the remainder is distributed as follows: 75 percent to ODOT, 10.7 percent to all municipalities in proportion to the number of licensed vehicles per jurisdiction, 9.3 percent to the 88 counties (each an equal share regardless of population or vehicles), and 5 percent to the 1308 Ohio Townships, like the counties, an equal amount to each Township. As a basis for reckoning, each County receives a little over $2 million per year. So, to answer your question, yes, most of the tax goes to state, municipal, county and township infrastructure for maintenance, repair and improvement. JT: As I remember those stickers on the back of semi-trailers, they said something like "This vehicle pays over $3750 annually in highway taxes." We do not see them anymore. Possibly because many studies have shown that one legally-loaded large truck imparts an equal amount of damage to a road as that of 10,000 passenger cars. Add to this that all bridges must be designed to carry trucks, not just cars, then consider the annual license fee you pay for your auto and realize that the truck does not pay 10,000 times that amount. (What the bumper sticker did not say is that the truck destroyed many times the $3750 in road damage.) You will say that license fees should not be raised on trucks, since that raise would simply be passed along to the consumer, and you would be right and that it why it has not happened. But therein lies a great part of our infrastructure problems. When we were kids, I remember playing "count the semi trucks" on the newly-built interstates. I doubt if kids do that anymore.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
Jim Surber
12/30/2016 6:12:00 PM
Yes, Mr. Walker. That could be rescinded and all support rolled into the utility bill I have been hypothesizing about.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
Jim Thompson
12/30/2016 5:27:00 PM
Just asking.....isn't part of the state gasoline taxes we pay at the pump already, supposedly, earmarked for infrastructure improvements? Hopefully Mr. Surber can speak to this.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
William T. Walker
12/30/2016 3:10:00 PM
In 2009 when the ARRA was passed for job creation by the Obama administration, their was major pushback from the GOP about the cost of the infrastructure and the deficit. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, I expect some pushback from the DEMS. LOL !
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
David Mayer
12/30/2016 1:15:00 PM
Nothing has to be privatized necessarily. All cars just need the proper electronic equipment to record when and where you used your car. You could get a bill once a month like a utility bill. Then the funds would be allocated to maintain the roads you used. A road does not get enough funding, it falls into disrepair and becomes unusable. We have collected things like road taxes the way we have because of the limits of technology. We can change that now, no more technological limits. Resistance will come from those who think they are getting something for free now and suddenly they have to pay for it. I suspect large trucks are not paying their actual costs for roads these days, for instance. Why do I think this? Many years ago, many trucking companies had signs on the backs of their trucks saying something like, "This truck pays $5,760 in road taxes each year." Why did those signs go away? I suspect their lobbying arm, through inflation, got their taxes to be a smaller percentage of costs than they used to be. Hence, they are silent because they have nothing to complain about. Just a hunch, but it is peculiar why this changed.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
Jim Thompson
12/30/2016 11:58:00 AM
I'm intrigued Mr. Thompson. I'm not opposed on principle because most Americans don't drive (seniors, children, city dwellers) plus our country is bankrupt. But several logistical questions come to mind: 1. Would all roads be privatized? 2. If yes, what happens to those roads that private contractors are unable or refuse to maintain? 3. Can I get a tax credit for driving to work? 4. What impact would this have on food and product costs?
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
Greenfield George
12/30/2016 9:06:00 AM
We have "Lexus Lanes" in Atlanta with dynamic tolling. I am talking about using two-way GPS. With different prices for different roads depending on a set of criteria.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
Jim Thompson
12/29/2016 8:57:00 PM
"Dynamic tolling" started in the 1990's in CA and WA. The high occupancy vehicle lanes (carpool) are also very popular in FL where they charge more when congested. In CA., they are called "Lexus lanes" as the wealthy pay for shorter trip times. Lagging gas tax revenues due to increasing MPG on newer cars. plus hybrid and electric cars have CA lawmakers considering a per mile charge to fund the huge deficit the state faces for road repairs. Also privatization is on the table.
This comment has been hidden due to low approval.
David Mayer
12/29/2016 3:56:00 PM
1
2
Submit A Comment
Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.
*
indicates a required field
Comment
*
Your Name
Email
Phone
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.
Note:
All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit
X
Search only accepts letters and numbers.
Most Viewed
Most Commented
Fairfield Local Athletic Hall of Fame Committee announces 2023 Hall of Fame inductees
(1117 views)
2022-23 FAC/SHAC High School Basketball Results
(1088 views)
State-ranked Fairfield Lions defeat county rival Hillsboro by 22 points
(891 views)
Timothy 'Rug' E. Griffith
(862 views)
Timothy E. Brown
(780 views)
You can’t have it both ways
(17 comments)
Highland County land bank agrees to 'cost-sharing agreement' with Village of Greenfield; will contribute $50K toward Elliott Hotel demo
(3 comments)
A tale of two princes
(3 comments)
Texas border sheriff sends SOS seeking aid: 'Illegal aliens wreaking havoc in our communities'
(2 comments)
Janet 'Jan' L. Hammond
(2 comments)
Our app is now available!
YouTube
|
Twitter/HCPSports
|
Twitter
|
Facebook
|
Life
|
Home
Content © 2018 Cameco Communications • 128 S. High Street • Hillsboro, Ohio 45133
The Highland County Press
Telephone 937-840-9490 • Fax 937-840-9492 • Email
[email protected]
Privacy Policy
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##